It is a shame to see how blogs and YouTube videos, which discuss critical news about SAIC and the billion-dollar high-tech deals that give birth to insider dealing and mega corruption, can be labeled with adult warnings, but I've seen clips of John Waters' movies on YouTube with nudity and self-gratification scenes, but that's deemed perfectly funny by our admittedly raunchy online standards. But as soon as a blogger starts talking about RICO charges and triple damages and civil and criminal trials, then we focus our eyes and attention on boobs, and we find reasons to restrict access to information that no msm outlet is putting out there. I wonder what would happen if I shaved my chest and put on a pair of falsies under a bikini top ? Would you give me a free pass, like topless YouTube clips of Edith Massey ? Would I finally get some attention focused on my Kickstarter project ?
But then again, I'd probably get labeled as adult content by your same sick and twisted double standards, and I'd only succeed at getting warnings on my online content. Just because all men stare at Suzannah's boobs don't mean we should drape a digital full-body cloaks (aka adult warnings) on her YouTube videos -- against her will. Did I miss something, or isn't this exactly what you are doing to her work ? She's too sexy even in clothes, so let's drape her videos in adult warnings like a quasi "e-burka."
Louis Flores in Response to Suzannah B. Troy's email...
Suzannah B. Troy's letter in The Arts Section of The New York Time on Women and Porn -- Mae Weset Reference and Google YouTubes actions underscore what Louis Flores calls an E-Burka that I also made reference to in this letter how many years ago?
My video response....
also proves my points that women can't be heard -- it is about been seen -- the male gaze...disgusting sexual discrimination and again the misogynist censorship is applied via Google YouTube automatically without me being given a chance to respond before being removed!!!!!